Skip to content

Why does ChatGPT recommend other law firms instead of mine?

Because a client's question rarely includes your name, and on those questions AI answers lean on directories, reviews and lists instead of your website. The firms they name are the ones other sites already describe, consistently. Fix what AI says about your firm first, then get onto the sources the answers cite for your practice area.

I’m a marketer, not a lawyer, and nothing here is legal advice. Your state bar’s rules decide what a directory profile or a review request may say. This page covers how AI answers pick firms and what a firm can check.

Two kinds of question, two different answers

Someone who already knows your firm types its name: “Is [firm] any good?” Someone who doesn’t describes a problem: “My employer didn’t pay my overtime. What can I do, and who handles that near me?” AI assistants answer those differently.

In my AI answers field report, which pools graded answers about 9 businesses in different industries, not law firms specifically, the business was named 90.2% of the time when the question named it (751 of 833 answers). On problem questions that named nobody, it was named 2.6% of the time (16 of 623). 6 of the 9 businesses were never named on a problem question at all.

In the pooled answers, AI found the business when asked and rarely offered it when it wasn’t.

What the answer is built from

When an assistant answers “who should I hire,” it reads other sites and summarizes them. In the field report, pooled across 9 businesses in different industries, not law firms specifically, the domains cited for the most businesses were facebook.com, google.com, linkedin.com, reddit.com, bbb.org, yelp.com, youtube.com.

Your website explains your services well, and the assistants do use it to explain how something works. When the question turns to who to hire, they want someone else vouching for you. For a law firm that usually means:

  • Legal directories. Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, Martindale and Super Lawyers profiles, many of them built from state bar records whether you claimed them or not.
  • Your state bar’s lawyer directory. The record many directories copy.
  • Reviews. Your Google profile and the review sites the answers quote.
  • Lists and articles. “Best [practice area] lawyers in [city]” pages, local news and legal Q&A sites.

What the firms that get named tend to have

I don’t have a law-specific measurement. The figures below are pooled across 9 businesses in different industries, not law firms specifically, and they point to four things I’d check first:

  1. The same facts everywhere. In the shorter snapshot checks, 4 of 4 businesses had facts that disagreed across their own site and listings, at least 6 each. An assistant that finds two addresses or two sets of practice areas hedges, or picks the wrong one.
  2. Reviews on the platforms the answers quote. 4 of 4 snapshot businesses had fewer Google reviews than the median competitor the answers named. That’s a pattern, not proof of cause, but it matches what the answers cite.
  3. Complete, claimed directory profiles. An unclaimed profile carries whatever the directory compiled. The law directory guide covers claiming each one.
  4. A page that answers the client’s question. If a client asks about unpaid overtime, the firm with a plain page on overtime claims in that state has something an assistant can quote.

What doesn’t explain it

Blocked crawlers, almost never. In the field report data, pooled across 9 businesses in different industries, not law firms specifically, all 530 fetches I made with AI and search crawler user agents across 9 sites came back HTTP 200. Check your robots.txt once, then move on.

One test isn’t a ranking. Ask the same question three times and you’ll get different firms. Count across runs before deciding where you stand.

Fake reviews break federal rules. The FTC’s consumer review rule (16 CFR Part 465) (checked October 27, 2026) bans fake reviews and rewards tied to a positive review, and your bar’s rules on testimonials apply on top. Ask real clients, and reply to what they write without disclosing anything about their matter.

Check what AI says about your firm

The free What AI says about you template has ten questions to ask, a log for each answer and a ledger for your facts. For a firm, fill it in like this:

  • Questions 1 to 6 with your firm’s name, so you can see what the assistants say when a client already knows you.
  • Question 9 with a problem your best clients describe in their own words, before they know they need a lawyer.
  • Questions 7, 8 and 10 with your city and your main practice area, and the firm you lose consults to.

Ask each question three times on the assistants your clients use, then count. Fix any wrong fact at its source first: it reaches the client closest to calling, and it’s a change you control. The guide to wrong firm details shows how to trace each one.

If the firm’s ads are part of how it grows, the signed-case tracking guide covers the other half: knowing which calls turn into cases.

When to bring me in

Bring me in when AI answers get your hours, address or services wrong, when they name competitors for the work you want, or when you’ve fixed your listings and want to know whether the answers changed.

I'm Conner Crowe, and I write every audit myself. Send your website and your market. There’s nothing to grant, and within 48 hours you'll have a written read on what each AI assistant says about you and where the wrong facts come from. No call needed, and nothing in your account or store changes.

Get a free AI answer snapshot

Or run the check yourself with the free What AI says about you template.

Tools for this diagnosis

All my free tools

Related questions

Back to the full law firm marketing: the signed-case library

Same check,
run on your business.

Send your website and your market. I'll ask 10 questions your buyers ask on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity, and within 48 hours you'll have what each one says about you, which facts are wrong and where they come from. Free, written by me, no call needed.