47.66° N 117.43° W Summit · Profitable Growth
Pricing Every Qualified Law-Firm Call by Matter Type
Part two of the Greenacre Law engagement. The account had clean tracking and qualified-call conversions, but every conversion imported at zero dollars, so the account couldn't tell a $2,500 document review from a $15,000 litigation case. I built a call-scoring system that reads every recorded paid call and prices the qualified ones with the firm's own numbers.
The numbers
02 The breakdown
The Setup
This is part two. Part one rebuilt the account around intent and fixed the tracking so qualified phone calls, not raw form submits, drove the numbers.
That left a quieter problem. The firm converts on the phone. The call-tracking platform imported qualified calls into Google Ads as conversions, and every one of them arrived worth zero dollars. Smart Bidding could count leads. It could not tell that one caller was a $2,500 contract review and the next was a $15,000 partition lawsuit. To the algorithm, they were identical.
What Was Broken
Two gaps, one on each side of the signal.
Nobody was consistently scoring the calls. Intake was busy running a law office. Calls got labeled qualified or not with human lag and human drift, and a meaningful share never got labeled at all.
Qualified had no dollar value. The import pipeline supported passing a sales value per lead. The field sat empty.
There was also a structural trap most call-first accounts share: only about 15% of the firm’s paid calls carried a click ID. Anything keyed on click IDs alone would have missed most of the calls, so the scoring had to work from the call recordings and the caller record in the call-tracking platform.
What I Built
A scoring system that treats every recorded call like a junior analyst would, with the firm’s own definitions:
- Every inbound paid call gets processed locally. The audio never leaves the machine it runs on.
- Each call is scored to a three-outcome rubric. Booked or retained. Warm but unclosed. Not viable. Before trusting it, I benchmarked the scoring against calls the firm’s own team had labeled by hand. On clear rejections it matched 6 for 6. Where it disagreed with a human Yes, a second listen showed the human label was the loose one.
- Each qualified call is classified into the firm’s 13 matter types, which fold into three value tiers the firm itself priced: negotiations at $2,500, probate at $9,000, litigation at $15,000. I didn’t invent the values. The firm put its own prices on its own work.
- The value is written onto qualified leads in the call-tracking platform, and stops there. Never on rejections, and a hard rule allows one qualified conversion per caller per month, so a persistent caller cannot inflate the count. The write order is deliberate: audit note first, committing field last, so a mid-write failure leaves the lead retryable instead of corrupted.
The Result
The first backfill pass valued 132 qualified leads with zero errors: 36 negotiations, 35 probate, 61 litigation, each carrying its tier value. The window held more qualified leads than that. The rest were non-legal matters or older calls that couldn’t be classified with confidence, so they were deliberately left unvalued. Nothing was guessed. The first live scoring pass read 236 calls and sorted them into 67 qualified, 110 not viable, and 59 follow-ups. The system now runs unattended five nights a week.

What I Did Not Claim
A CPA improvement or any bidding result. What I’m documenting here is the scoring and the pricing, checked lead by lead against the call-tracking platform. How bidding uses those values is a later decision, and this page doesn’t claim a result from it.
The Takeaway
Smart Bidding optimizes toward exactly what you feed it. Feed it counts and it buys you callers. For any business that converts on the phone, the first job is a qualified call as the conversion, and the second is knowing what each kind of call is worth.
Want your calls scored by what each kind is worth? Get a free ads audit. I write it myself and send it back within 24 hours of read-only access. No call.
03 More work
More from Greenacre Law.
224 pages live, english and spanish
I designed and built greenacre.law: 224 live pages, a full Spanish mirror, a four-office local structure matched to filing venues, per-page-type structured data, and a URL contract that survived the move intact. Every figure on this page was measured against the live site.
Read the breakdown→50% ad spend reduction
Greenacre Law, a Southern California real estate law firm, was burning budget on broad-match keywords with broken conversion tracking. I rebuilt the account around intent, fixed the data, and cut spend in half while doubling qualified signups inside 90 days.
Read the breakdown→Free ads audit, written by me
Want this kind of breakdown on your account?
Add me as a read-only user and I'll write the audit myself: where the leak is and what to fix first, 5 to 7 pages, back within 24 hours of access. No call needed. If you'd rather talk first, a call is open too.